PDF
What's on Your Hard Drive?
Welcome back for another installment of “What’s on Your Hard Drive?” where you tell us about the tools you love, the tools you hate, and a category that’s recently grown in popularity: tools that you both love and hate. And by tools we don’t just mean pieces of software; feel free to express your love and/or hatred for both IDEs and the programming languages we use within them.
Programming language allegiances are usually much stronger than tool preferences, so this is bound to make for some heated debate over at www.acmqueue.com, where you can both submit to WOYHD and comment on others’ submissions.
Who: Dave Wingate
What industry: Education
Job title: Software developer
Flavor: Develops on Linux, Windows for Linux, Windows
Tool I love! DbVisualizer. This tool flatters my intuition. Whenever I’m working with a database and think, “There really ought to be a tool to ___________,” DbVisualizer usually has what I need.
Tool I hate! ClearCase. It seems I can’t even sneeze without inadvertently hijacking a file from this source control utility. Combine that with the tool’s scant documentation and you’ve got a recipe for aggravation.
Who: Duane Dixon
What industry: Education
Job title: Certified network specialist (CNS)
Flavor: Develops on Windows for Windows
Tool I love! ColdFusion Studio 5. I love the many helpful tools, such as the color-coded tags and the shortcut keys for tags that are used rather frequently; and that the interface is intuitively laid out. I just like the simplicity of the entire program.
Tool I hate! FrontPage. I am not especially keen on tools that write the code for me, though I do use Macromedia’s Dreamweaver on occasion. I don’t like FrontPage because of the sloppy code that it generates and the fact that it uses nonstandard tags.
Who: Sancho Neves-Graca
What industry: Technology vendor
Job title: Software developer
Flavor: Develops on Windows, Mac OS X for Windows, Mac OS X
Tool I love! Mathematica. It’s a powerful technical computing platform that allows rapid prototype development with an elegant symbolic language inspired mostly by C and Lisp. Its notebook interface encourages exploratory programming with text and code all in a single document, which can be wrapped up as a self-contained package.
Tool I hate! C++. It’s a superset of C full of good intentions but that ultimately just extends the complications of a good procedural language with OO principles and does little to reduce code bloat.
Who: Fredrik Tolf
What industry: Education
Job title: Student
Flavor: Develops on Linux for Posix
Tool I love! Emacs. First of all, it does what I want as opposed to what it wants. And if it doesn’t, I can easily make it. Second,
it builds on Lisp, one of the most elegant languages in computing history (which is, of course, what makes it fulfill the first condition).
Tool I hate! Java. It’s unnecessarily complex and, in particular, crufty. It qualifies as neither an elegant language nor a “do-what-I-want” language. It qualifies only as an “intuitive” language for inexperienced people (which I don’t count myself as).
Originally published in Queue vol. 3, no. 6—
Comment on this article in the ACM Digital Library
More related articles:
Dennis Roellke - String Matching at Scale
String matching can't be that difficult. But what are we matching on? What is the intrinsic identity of a software component? Does it change when developers copy and paste the source code instead of fetching it from a package manager? Is every package-manager request fetching the same artifact from the same upstream repository mirror? Can we trust that the source code published along with the artifact is indeed what's built into the release executable? Is the tool chain kosher?
Catherine Hayes, David Malone - Questioning the Criteria for Evaluating Non-cryptographic Hash Functions
Although cryptographic and non-cryptographic hash functions are everywhere, there seems to be a gap in how they are designed. Lots of criteria exist for cryptographic hashes motivated by various security requirements, but on the non-cryptographic side there is a certain amount of folklore that, despite the long history of hash functions, has not been fully explored. While targeting a uniform distribution makes a lot of sense for real-world datasets, it can be a challenge when confronted by a dataset with particular patterns.
Nicole Forsgren, Eirini Kalliamvakou, Abi Noda, Michaela Greiler, Brian Houck, Margaret-Anne Storey - DevEx in Action
DevEx (developer experience) is garnering increased attention at many software organizations as leaders seek to optimize software delivery amid the backdrop of fiscal tightening and transformational technologies such as AI. Intuitively, there is acceptance among technical leaders that good developer experience enables more effective software delivery and developer happiness. Yet, at many organizations, proposed initiatives and investments to improve DevEx struggle to get buy-in as business stakeholders question the value proposition of improvements.
João Varajão, António Trigo, Miguel Almeida - Low-code Development Productivity
This article aims to provide new insights on the subject by presenting the results of laboratory experiments carried out with code-based, low-code, and extreme low-code technologies to study differences in productivity. Low-code technologies have clearly shown higher levels of productivity, providing strong arguments for low-code to dominate the software development mainstream in the short/medium term. The article reports the procedure and protocols, results, limitations, and opportunities for future research.
© ACM, Inc. All Rights Reserved.