<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ACM Queue - opinion</title>
    <link>http://queue.acm.org/listing.cfm?sort=publication_date&amp;order=desc&amp;item_topic=all&amp;qc_type=opinion&amp;filter=all&amp;page_title=</link>
    <description />
    <item>
      <title>Resolved: the Internet Is No Place for Critical Infrastructure</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2479677</link>
      <description>Risk is a necessary consequence of dependence</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:43:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Dan Geer</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2479677</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deduplicating Devices Considered Harmful</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1985003</link>
      <description>A good idea, but it can be taken too far</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 14:52:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>David Rosenthal</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1985003</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All-Optical Computing and All-Optical Networks are Dead</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1530830</link>
      <description>Anxiously awaiting the arrival of all-optical computing? Don't hold your breath.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Charles Beeler, Craig Partridge</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1530830</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Things I Learned in School</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1388790</link>
      <description>How many of us have not had the experience of sitting in a classroom wondering idly: "Is this really going to matter out in the real world?" It's curious, and in no small amount humbling, to realize how many of those nuggets of knowledge really do matter. One cropped up recently for me: the Finite State Machine (FSM). As we continue to develop the new UI for our product, we'll definitely be using FSMs wherever possible.</description>
      <category>networks</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:03:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Terry Coatta</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1388790</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From Here to There, the SOA Way</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1388788</link>
      <description>SOA is no more a silver bullet than the approaches which preceded it. Back in ancient times, say, around the mid '80s when I was a grad student, distributed systems research was in its heyday. Systems like Trellis/Owl and Eden/Emerald were exploring issues in object-oriented language design, persistence, and distributed computing. One of the big themes to come out of that time period was 'location transparency', the idea that the way that you access an object should be independent of where it is located. That is, it shouldn't matter whether an object is in the same process, on the same machine in a different process, or on another machine altogether. Syntactically, the way that I interact with that object is the same; I'm just invoking a method on the object.</description>
      <category>systems</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Terry Coatta</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1388788</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Only Code Has Value?</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1388789</link>
      <description>A recent conversation about development methodologies turned to the relative value of various artifacts produced during the development process, and the person I was talking with said: the code has "always been the only artifact that matters. It's just that we're only now coming to recognize that." My reaction to this, not expressed at that time, was twofold. First, I got quite a sense of d&amp;#233;j&amp;#224;-vu since it hearkened back to my time as an undergraduate and memories of many heated discussions about whether code was self-documenting. Second, I thought of several instances from recent experience in which the code alone simply was not enough to understand why the system was architected in a particular way.</description>
      <category>systems</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Terry Coatta</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1388789</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Corba: Gone but (Hopefully) Not Forgotten</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1388786</link>
      <description>There is no magic and the lessons of the past apply just as well today.</description>
      <category>languages</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:03:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Terry Coatta</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1388786</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ground Control to Architect Tom...</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1317396</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Project managers love him, recent software engineering graduates&#xD;
bow to him, and he inspires code warriors deep in the development&#xD;
trenches to wonder if a technology time warp may have passed them&#xD;
by. How can it be that no one else has ever proposed software&#xD;
development with the simplicity, innovation, and automation being&#xD;
trumpeted by Architect Tom? His ideas sound so space-age, so&#xD;
futuristic, but why should that be so surprising? After all, Tom is&#xD;
an architecture astronaut!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:36:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Alex Bell</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1317396</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Embracing Wired Networks</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1255428</link>
      <description>Most people I know run wireless networks in their homes. Not me. I hardwired my home and leave the Wi-Fi turned off. My feeling is to do it once, do it right, and then forget about it. I want a low-cost network infrastructure with guaranteed availability, bandwidth, and security. If these attributes are important to you, Wi-Fi alone is probably not going to cut it.</description>
      <category>networks</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mache Creeger</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1255428</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Repurposing Consumer Hardware</title>
      <link>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1229905</link>
      <description>New uses for small form-factor, low-power machines</description>
      <category>hardware</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mache Creeger</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1229905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

