September/October 2018 issue of acmqueue The September/October issue of acmqueue is out now

Subscribers and ACM Professional members login here



Privacy and Rights

  Download PDF version of this article PDF

Error 526 Ray ID: 47d1e56bdb6a0ec7 • 2018-11-21 08:48:14 UTC

Invalid SSL certificate

You

Browser

Working
Newark

Cloudflare

Working
deliverybot.acm.org

Host

Error

What happened?

The origin web server does not have a valid SSL certificate.

What can I do?

If you're a visitor of this website:

Please try again in a few minutes.

If you're the owner of this website:

The SSL certificate presented by the server did not pass validation. This could indicate an expired SSL certificate or a certificate that does not include the requested domain name. Please contact your hosting provider to ensure that an up-to-date and valid SSL certificate issued by a Certificate Authority is configured for this domain name on the origin server. Additional troubleshooting information here.

acmqueue

Originally published in Queue vol. 5, no. 7
see this item in the ACM Digital Library


Tweet


Related:

Meng-Day (Mandel) Yu, Srinivas Devadas - Pervasive, Dynamic Authentication of Physical Items
The use of silicon PUF circuits


Nicholas Diakopoulos - Accountability in Algorithmic Decision-making
A view from computational journalism


Olivia Angiuli, Joe Blitzstein, Jim Waldo - How to De-identify Your Data
Balancing statistical accuracy and subject privacy in large social-science data sets


Jim Waldo, Alan Ramos, Weina Scott, William Scott, Doug Lloyd, Katherine O'Leary - A Threat Analysis of RFID Passports
Do RFID passports make us vulnerable to identity theft?



Comments

(newest first)

James Phillips | Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:05:23 UTC

You use the term "content owners". You can't own "content" after it has been published because ideas are not a tradeable commodities (It is impossible to forget on demand). Copyright law was invented to give authors a period to benefit from their work before the general public is able to copy and modify it any way they wish. Copy restrictions are self-imposed by society at large; society has little reason to obey any additional restrictions the author wants to add. That reasoning implies that DRM systems can only play an advisory role for the user. There may be legal or social reasons people want to follow that advice, but obedience is still at the whim of the user.

In the long term, it doesn't matter. I believe general-purpose computers will revolutionize society within about 3 centuries. I don't think it is possible for this to change even if they are outlawed for a time in the name of DRM. The biggest possible impact would be a "gap" in human history centering on the 21st century.

Unfortunately for me, I will be dead in 3 centuries. I like my general-purpose computers.


Leave this field empty

Post a Comment:







© 2018 ACM, Inc. All Rights Reserved.