I just finished reading William Gibsons The Peripheral for the second time, and I recommend you do too: Read it twice, I mean.
Gibsons always written densely; idiomatic, with good flow, but its really packed in. I remember decades ago, talking over the Sprawl books with my brother: Early on, he said, you have no idea whats going on. What with that, and beauty of the words, and the interesting people in the stories, and the big set-pieces& well, Ive never read any Gibson just once.
But I left out the biggest deal with his books: the backgrounds, the flavors, the astonishing skill at mise en scène. You are there in a Rasta-flavored orbital rocket, or postmodern Tokyo rock-star bar, or hand-crafted (by Arabs) robotic limousine. Or just, as here, in a low-rent Red-state town in a not-too-distant highly-foreseeable future, dealing with the impact of one time intersecting another.
More on that later; But did I say the writing is dense? This is maybe Gibsons thickest. On my first pass, I was working hard on some other stuff and picking up The Peripheral late and tired; and it wasnt so much that I was losing threads as failing to gather them. So I read it again, and it made ever so much more sense. And I enjoyed both trips through, a whole lot.
Whats good
Well, the niftiest dodge ever around time-travels paradoxes. And the raw contrast between the two futures: Because the other isnt like that Red-state hick town at all.
The male lead, Netherton, is really good; his struggle with alcohol is a sobering (ha-ha) counterpoint to his dance with the powers using him as a minor weapon in a big strange conflict.
And the very-early sequence with the patchers ; it has that genuine deep-strangeness, that explosion of brain flavors that keeps some of us going back to sci-fi. I sort of wish thered been a bit more of them. But wow.
Well and of course all the nifty and highly plausible future tech that ties everything together, starting with the time-travel.
Whats lame
Well, maybe I failed twice to gather the threads; but there are still parts of the story that dont make any sense. The all-powerful police boss Lowbeer doesnt seem to have any visible staff; and at the end of the day, why did they need to bring in trans-temporal telepresences for ninja duty, couldnt they have just used their regular security guys who had, you know, experience using peripherals? And give me a break, at Daedras big closing party, shes gonna let the guests ninjas accompany them when theres murder on multiple agendas? Particularly in a mode where ninjas can live through being suicide bombers?!
Our heroine Flynne is likeable and plucky but at the end of the day not that interesting; couldnt she have had a little twist here or there? But the everywoman narrator, engulfed in weirdness, is as old as the hills in sci-fi; and it actually works pretty well as a storytelling mechanic.
And Levs pet geek Ash didnt work for me at all; she wears weird clothes and irritates people, but I think she could have been subtracted from the book without loss of value.
The good bits
Ive pulled together a few, just for fun.
And this other evening light, rainy, rose and silver, and to her left a river the color of cold lead. Dark tumble of city, towers in the distance, few lights.
&their exposed flesh marked not with tattoos but intricately meaningless patterns expressed in pseudo-icthyotic scaling.
His eyes, set on the corners of his vast, entirely inhuman head, looked like something a child had scribbled, then erased.
She first noticed it, as she passed the twenty-third. A dry gray, against the wet dark metal. Color of dead skin pulled from a blister. Size of a childs backpack.
Thank you, Flynne said, and let her head down on the pillow, timesick, or maybe that and that texture thing, her old chambray pillowcase intricate as chess against her face, less familiar.
We may be able to change that. Lowbeer knows how to fix history? It isnt history yet, here&
Anyhow, if you like Gibson youll like this. It might even be a good Gibson for the first-timer to start with.